Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: News & Features: Features

Re: “Put a Bird on It

This is very interesting research. Another good example of the interface between humans and the natural order. We still have much to learn about birds and their true benefit to humans. I think tagging birds, like we have tagged other wild animals, will continue to provide us with valuable information like how do birds accommodate to the changing habitats and our environment. And, I hope we keep protecting our environment to provide a healthy place for birds to flourish.

Posted by Pedro Castaneda on 07/13/2016 at 1:28 PM

Re: “Put a Bird on It

It's a great article, thank you! I didn't mean to leave that out!

Posted by Maggie Rufo on 07/13/2016 at 11:31 AM

Re: “Put a Bird on It

"but the dark side of his success is that, most likely, he consumed his siblings—not uncommon in the unsentimental world of the barn owl." I'm sorry, this is not factual. They only consume siblings after they have died, or maybe almost died. They do not engage in siblicide.

Also, vineyards that kill birds can never be bird friendly. It's not a few non-native songbirds that get trapped and killed, it's more like thousands. and it's not ok.

I appreciate that vineyards are moving towards non-toxic, predator-friendly practices! Barn owls and bluebirds are a vineyards best friends as long as no poison is used. This is a great steady and much-needed, but there have been others - just recently in fact. Another study was published in the local Ag-Alert paper in April of this year! I look forward to the results of this new study.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Maggie Rufo on 07/13/2016 at 11:29 AM

Re: “The California Front

The budding politician and gun-owner Keith Rhinehart wants to work within the NRA: "Most NRA members, like myself, are pretty sane, normal people who don't believe you should be able to go to a gun show, buy a gun and walk out."

I'm sure many would like to know what efforts he's making within the NRA to put sane leadership in charge there. Otherwise, his money is just going to keeping in place the current extremists there now.

Posted by Chris Gilbert on 06/29/2016 at 12:38 PM

Re: “Eat More Beef

Mr Natural, my step-father is 90 years old, healthy, and drug-free, and eats meat every day of his life, for lunch and supper. I eat meat at least five days a week. I am 55 years old, an ultramarathoner who runs every single day of the year, without ever incurring injury, and I never get sick. I have a friend who is Sikh, from India, who is vegetarian and is alway suffering from some sort of nutritional deficiency, suffers from migraines, and allergies. What is your point? A person's health is not really as related to diet as much as Americans have been misled to believe. Many other variables factor into a person's health.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by barefoot on 06/26/2016 at 10:40 AM

Re: “The California Front

What the Congressman is a complete joke. Gun Control costs people lives, it does not save them. Look at all the mass shootings, they took place in gun free zones. Additionally, he speaks highly of California and it's ability to pass Gun Control laws that Governor Brown will sign. He simply neglected to mention that most of all the laws passed in California violate our Civil Rights by violating the Constitution's 2nd Amendment.

These laws will do little but make criminals bolder knowing the average citizen will not be able to defend themselves. They also forgot some minor details about California, we are in DEBT to almost the tune of $2,000,000,000,000.00. The Democrat Oligarchy that runs the state is kicking that figure down the road for now.....

3 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Freepot56 on 06/22/2016 at 3:23 PM

Re: “The California Front

If "a vote, any vote" was so important, then why did EVERY Democrat vote against the 2 bills Republicans offered in the US Senate??? Come up with a clever line to explain their craven hypocrisy - we'll wait

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Kirk Weir on 06/22/2016 at 10:40 AM

Re: “Of Water and Wine

Angwin. Howell Mountain, Napa County, under massive logging\deforestation proposals. Conversion to Vineyard is the #1 threat to environment. Ground water depletion, climate change, habit loss, wildlife migration corridors blocked, streams destroyed. Why interview a dweeb like Smith? He is a mad man.......

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Save Rural Angwin on 06/20/2016 at 6:17 PM

Re: “Of Water and Wine

Great article. Thank you Stett, for writing it and for publishing it in the Bohemian. I live on a hillside in the Napa Valley about a mile from the proposed Calistoga Hills Resort. A neighbor of mine cleared many acres of beautiful hillside forest and planted vineyard in its place. The chainsaws, tractors, and excavators were operating at all hours and days of the week on and off over several years time. The county and the state have no issue with a clear-cut like this, and I don't think he is done yet as there are still some trees left on his property. I wonder how many more "conversions" will be taking place on the hills of this county, since there is no agency that restrains greedy owners from cutting all the trees on a property.

8 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Don Scott on 06/15/2016 at 10:13 PM

Re: “Of Water and Wine

This is exactly why big wine money wants to elect Hopkins; to continue their push onto our remaining hillsides and coastal hillsides. Come on Sonoma county, get out from behind your I-phones and help elect Noreen Evans. It's not "Imagine if she wins" we need you in the streets talking to your neighbors and fighting for what's at stake here.
Ken Sund- Jenner

4 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by kensund on 06/15/2016 at 4:01 PM

Re: “Of Water and Wine

Though there are problems in Napa, they seem far ahead of Sonoma County in reigning in the over-growth of the wine industry, and thus preserving food farming and rural diversity. That's why Napa vintners such as Paul Hobbs and Joe Wagner are moving some of their operations out of Napa and into Sonoma County and beyond. For more information, go to www.winewaterwatch.org

4 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Shepherd Bliss on 06/15/2016 at 10:02 AM

Re: “Crude Awakening

With a weak coastal commission and a big business dominated Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, Noreen Evans will help effectively push back Big Oil and Big Wine and Big real estate. Take back our coast and save our environment.

Posted by kensund on 06/09/2016 at 8:23 AM

Re: “Crude Awakening

This article reveals yet another reason for electing environmentalist Noreen Evans as the 5th District Supervisor. She would be more able to stand up to Big Oil and its damage to the environment, including the climate, as well as to Big Wine. It is our habitat that provides jobs, not the corporations that rape nature.

2 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Shepherd Bliss on 06/08/2016 at 12:08 PM

Re: “Silent Treatment

Murdered

Posted by Brad Pipal on 05/25/2016 at 2:10 PM

Re: “Taking the 5th

So far it seems clear that Lynda Hopkins' campaign has a lot of money to spend. When a candidate has a war chest so large that she can purchase expensive, multi-page newspaper inserts weeks before the campaign, I start to wonder who's paying for it.

She seems like a perfectly fine human being, and may have the best of intentions. However, Ms. Hopkins is relatively new to the area and is already funded by many of the same big businesses that funded Effren Carillo (most notably the Ratto Group). Accepting that funding without knowing that there will be an expectation of payback is either painfully naive or worse, highly calculating and corrupt. Either way, that should give us pause.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by WestCounty9 on 04/19/2016 at 2:53 PM

Re: “Sacred Ground

Absolutely fabulous reporting. Nice to hear the proceeds from Graton Casino are being used so ingeniously. Well done.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by cgtripp on 04/12/2016 at 2:13 PM

Re: “Taking the 5th

These comments are, in and of themselves, so biased, they prove many of the points made in the article. They're like a spectacular illustration of the entire idea behind Jonah Raskin's thoughts.

In reality, Raskin's write-up on the 5th District Supervisorial Race captures well the political theater that typifies Sonoma County and SoCo as a microcosm of broader American political trends. While some supporters of Noreen Evans, who has served the public as an elected official before and has many supporters, seem to have taken umbrage at this look at regional politics - certainly all of the folks posting here - they miss the underlying point: politics is always the politics of perception and the perception of this race is that it's getting a little dicey - one might say, as Raskin has, gonzo.

The article is less about Evans and contender Lynda Hopkins, who has not served in elected office before and has many supporters, than it is about the inner workings of the sometimes brutal political machine that informs our contemporary politics and the journalists and campaign workers who hear and know the real stories of local and regional campaigns that can often trend harsh behind the scenes - despite the apparent idealism of the candidates.

3 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Chip McAuley on 03/16/2016 at 6:58 PM

Re: “Taking the 5th

I agree with Laura Gonzalez. As she said, "This is a sadly disappointing article. I was actually embarrassed for Jonah Rankin while reading this piece." The references to Hunter Thompson made no sense at all, his lack of substance about what each of the candidates stand for, his obvious bias in favor of Lynda Hopkins simply because she is young and inexperience, and his tying Noreen Evans to the "good old boys" when it is Hopkins through the support of Koenigshafer, the big business group Alliance, etc. who is a young,female, inexperienced "good old boy" in the making. Yes, she's the Hillary Clinton in the race. If you really want to protect the Sonoma County we know and love, vote for Noreen Evans.

Lilith Rogers

9 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Lilith Rogers on 03/15/2016 at 12:08 AM

Re: “Taking the 5th

This is a sadly disappointing article. I was actually embarrassed for Jonah Rankin while reading this piece. He obviously has no clue about local politics. "Can Lynda Hopkins bust up the West County Boys' Club"? ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME? She's new face of the Boys' Club! Why didn't you take off the rose-colored glasses before interviewing and rallying around Lynda Hopkins? She's a carpetbagger, she's no FDR, and she's bought and paid for by the same people who foisted Efren Carrillo on us. His backers are now her backers. Herman Hernandez Jr, her campaign manager, and his dad, have been staunch Carrillo supporters since the beginning. And her consultant is Rob Muelrath, and you're trying to tell us she's not an insider and she's going to "save the 5th"? From what? A seasoned veteran who has stood with working class people her whole political life? A politician who isn't in the back pocket of Mr. Doug Bosco?

Do you know why Eric Koenigshafer isn't running, even though he said he would if his buddy Efren didn't run? Because the puppetmasters found someone better, and Eric knows it's all about the machine, and not him. That's why he gallantly stepped aside for Hopkins.

Do us all a major favor and stop writing about local politics until you actually know something about local politics. Sheesh.

10 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Laura Gonzalez on 03/14/2016 at 9:15 PM

Re: “Taking the 5th

The title of this article is highly misleading.

"Take Back the Fifth District" from who?

And for what?

From the SAME people who backed Efren Carrillo in his last two election bids?

And to keep the strings of power attached firmly to someone who has never held public office, who has never written a piece of legislation which has actually affected the lives of community members and who has NEVER cast a SINGLE VOTE for or against a resolution, an item or a bill?

As far as I'm concerned, this article is so full of biases, inaccuracies and intentionally misleading meanderings that it has been rendered completely meaningless to anyone who was looking to your publication for an investigative treatise on the two candidates' respective backgrounds, qualifications and abilities to represent and lead the voters of the Fifth District.

Sadly, you fritted away a grand opportunity to do so - and seriously impaled your journalistic integrity in the process.

8 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Thomas Bonfigli on 03/14/2016 at 3:59 PM

Facebook Activity

This Week's Issue

July 20-26, 2016
Issue Cover

Copyright © 2016 Metro Newspapers. All rights reserved.

Website powered by Foundation