Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

Comment Archives: stories: Columns & Blogs: Letters to the Editor: Last 30 Days

Re: “Letters to the Editor: October 12, 2016

I'm Evans has no specifics. And the ones she has are illegal or not practical.

Posted by Jay on 10/21/2016 at 10:42 PM

Re: “Letters to the Editor: October 19, 2016

Noreen's only argument is that she has been in government so many years. Where is real policy? Oh ya pot for potholes (she won't get that money) and use pension money to fund housing (oh ya that's illegal). Time for new ideas.

Posted by J on 10/21/2016 at 10:39 PM

Re: “Letters to the Editor: October 12, 2016

a perfunctory perusal? done at perhaps at a precursory level?

Posted by MHilber on 10/19/2016 at 6:56 PM

Re: “Letters to the Editor: October 19, 2016

David Katz hits the nail on the head with respect to Erik K. It is sad that he brings so much money and misery into the local contest for the 5th District. His funding of the unsubstantiated allegations against Noreen Evans are a disgrace.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Shepherd Bliss on 10/19/2016 at 3:04 PM

Re: “Letters to the Editor: September 27, 2016

In the terse, anti-Lynda Hopkins letter, the writer opined that she should not be running for county supervisor, because she is the mother of two young girls.

Does he mean that she should not work outside of her home? Would he say the exact same thing if it were her husband who was seeking this county job? Haven't we gotten beyond such antiquated thinking?

Simplistic either/or arguments are in vogue: the woman can apparently either choose to be a good mother or a good supervisor, but not both. To the contrary, Lynda Hopkins is an excellent mom, and she will--simultaneously--be an excellent supervisor.

Mark Tansil, Sebastopol

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Mark Tansil on 09/29/2016 at 8:12 PM

Facebook Activity

This Week's Issue

October 26- 1, 2016
Issue Cover

Copyright © 2016 Metro Newspapers. All rights reserved.

Website powered by Foundation