I get your message and I appreciate the anti-reductionist perspective. The metaphor is well done. However I don't get how carbon farming, for one, is reductionist. And more importantly, it seems to me that promoting carbon farming as a climate change solution would be: pro a non-anthropocentric philosophy of expansion, colonialism and speciesism, a non-capitalistic approach to producing value, a lessening of consumerism, a poster child of what a functional education system would look like, an obvious statement that money is not the most important thing in life, and one of the most cost effective, recycling, ecological, environmental, community building and holistic approaches, albeit in ONLY the agricultural sector(!?), that actually can reduce the amount of carbon in the atmosphere.
In other words, instead of dismissing approaches that are only part of the solution (and therefor reinforcing the reductionist paradigm) we should be encouraging ALL of these approaches as part of the whole solution (thereby demonstrating functional education, holistic philosophy, and humanistic forms of economic policy.
Do you a business loan or you want to clear an urgent debt? You need a fast loan with minimum approval and low security insurance? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
Hello, My Name Is Charles Xavi i am an admiral in the American Navy
i want to tell you my testimony of how i was cured of HERPES by DR IVIE
i had been affected by this illness for the past 8 years and i had been up
to many hospitals and clinics i even tried a surgical procedure but it
yielded no results so i heard of DR IVIE from friend who has been
helped by him and i decided to try him out although i was afraid of
scam but i know all men are not the same and i tried his herbal medicine
to my greatest surprise he was able to cure me within 2 weeks and then
i had my health back and i want to refer you to him through this contacts
EMAIL ADDRESS: email@example.com
and then he also has medicine
for the following illnesses
*LOW SPERM COUNT
you can contact me for verification on facebook Charles Xaxi
My Name is clinton john i work with Quick loans finance a legitimate and reliable loan company located in Detroit,Us. We currently give out loans at low interest rate of 2.5% and with no credit check,we offer personal loans, debt consolidation loans,venture capital, business loans, education, home loans or loans for any reason, from $ 1,000 to $ 1 million range. However, our method allows you to specify the loan amount needed and duration you can afford it, it gives you a real chance to get the funds you need! If you are interested, contact via Email:(firstname.lastname@example.org) Thanks...
We are Barclays Loan Service we Provides both long and short term loan financing. We offer secure and confidential loans at a very low interest rate of 2% per year, Personal loans, Debt Consolidation Loan, Venture Capital, Business Loan, Corporate Loans, Educational Loan, Home Loan and Loans for any reason!
We are the trusted alternative to bank financing, and our application process is simple and straight forward. Our loan ranges from $5,000.00 to $25, 000,000.00. (Twenty Five Million Dollars). Additional Info: We're fast becoming the private, discreet, and service oriented lending choice for general loans. We're the company to turn to when traditional lending sources fail.
If you are interested do not hesitate to contact us with informations below by Email, email@example.com
Mr. Roy Smith,
Head, Loans Application Department,
BARCLAYS LOAN SERVICE,
Such a great example of life in Trump's America. The entire show is about tough-talking men acting like methed-out animals in a cage, spinning bullshit, shouting insults, and fake-fighting. As with Trump, it isn't so much surprising that it exists as it is that people actually find it compelling.
"Sonoma County law enforcers are notorious for....and violation of civil rights. There is a pressing need for independent investigations of police misconduct. "
Very true, there is a serious problem of culture within the sheriff's organization, a problem of attitude, arrogance and contempt for citizens' civil rights. I don't know about Threet's "audit" process, but he here discloses he is not considering complaints of more than one year old. He would do well to look at more complaints including older ones and look for patterns of abuse. I filed a written complaint myself and was completely dissatisfied with the "acted appropriately" finding, or whatever they called it. Would have filed another regarding a separate encounter with a different deputy for similar reasons but knowing it would be a waste of time didn't bother.
Peter Byrnes Open Mic column raised the legitimate question of whether the newly created Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach (IOLERO) is worth the money necessary to run it. Of course, these questions were discussed at length in multiple public forums by county officials and community members for over a year, the public largely supported the proposal, and county supervisors approved the model creating our office. Byrne now again raises this issue, but in a way that distorts the facts we provided him.
IOLERO has a total budget of $527,335. Approximately 75% of the budget is made up of salaries and benefits of the agencys two employees, the Director and Administrative Coordinator. My salary as Director is around $160K, plus benefits, for a total of about $263K in compensation. My assistants salary is approximately $63K, plus benefits, for a total of about $122K in compensation. Because the IOLERO Director is required to be an attorney, the compensation for that position is commensurate with public attorney salaries. In accepting this position, I took a salary cut from the $180K I previously received as a Deputy City Attorney. I did so because I believe this is important work.
The remaining $130K includes support services and supplies, which account for 25% of the budget. More than the refreshments mentioned by Byrne, this covers rents/utilities, advertising and marketing, translations services, professional memberships, conferences (such as the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement), software licenses, business travel, etc. This also includes about $40K for the possible relocation of our office, which we have decided against spending in order to preserve continuity of the current location and save money.
Byrne asks what you are getting for this money, and focuses on my decision to forgo additional review of the Andy Lopez shooting. Ill turn to that in a minute. First, lets look at what our office has been doing. When I started last April, I began to set up an entirely new department from scratch, including a work plan, websites, social media, office procedures, audit protocols, hiring an assistant, meetings with stakeholders, and outreach to communities. From April until July of 2016, those start-up tasks took all of my time, but by August of last year, we were fully staffed, and up and running. So, what are our missions?
First, we provide independent civilian review of investigations of complaints against Sheriffs Deputies. Since August of 2016, we have 25 such investigations in our log, 15 of which have been completed by the Sheriff's Office and referred to IOLERO for review. Of those 15, we have completed 8 audits. 3 of these audits resulted in recommended changes to Sheriffs policies. In 6 of them, IOLERO agreed with the findings of the investigation exonerating the deputy of wrongdoing. In 2 of them, IOLERO disagreed with the finding of exonerated. While our office has no authority to impose a contrary finding on a complaint investigation, neither do most civilian oversight agencies in the country.
Second, we conduct robust outreach to Sonoma County communities, to bring community feedback back to the Sheriffs Office and to help explain Sheriffs policies to community members. We also try to bridge gaps where they exist. I've had over 100 meetings and met with many hundreds of community members since last April, including most recently close to 200 members of the undocumented immigrant community in small settings, hearing their concerns and explaining Sheriffs policies that may affect them. We have an 11 member Community Advisory Council that holds meetings to review policies and recommend changes. Our current focus is on immigration policies of the Sheriffs Office. Both the CAC and I will soon be making formal recommendations for changes in the Sheriffs policies in this area. We will then turn to review other policies, such a body worn cameras, and use of force. The most important opportunity to change law enforcement interactions that the public wants improved is through changes in the policies that guide deputy actions.
Finally, Byrne correctly states that I declined to review the Lopez shooting, but significantly misrepresents my explanation. IOLERO's general policy is not to audit completed investigations over 1 year old, as the statute of limitations has passed on any possible discipline for the deputy for any violation of policy. In addition, the Lopez shooting was independently reviewed by the District Attorney and by the U.S. Department of Justice, both of which cleared the deputy of a wrongdoing. Finally, the Lopez case is being litigated in federal civil court, where the issue of whether the deputy followed policy is being fully explored by an independent magistrate. Give these multiple reviews, and the passage of the statute of limitations on discipline for the deputy, there is little a review by our office could add at this late juncture. Because there are other investigation currently pending in our log where our review could make a difference, it makes little sense to focus our limited resources on the 2013 Lopez shooting.
If the tax fails there will still be increased pressure to crack down on illegal growing in residential areas. It's not as if voting no will give growers in rural residential areas continued free rein. Maybe you should think twice before voting no.
As someone who has been in the industry for many years- and currently operates several hundred square feet below the "cottage level" cutoff (ie- under 2500 sq ft hoophouse), I couldn't disagree with you more.
The SoCo taxes as proposed to start are better then any of the other legal states. Worse then Humboldt- better then what has been proposed or passed anywhere south or east of here. Yes the "up to" 10% is scary. But this is a process in a process- the county, for those that have been involved in the process- clearly wants to support small operators and not kill the goose that laid the golden egg.
Welcome to the real world or regulation, taxes, osha, labor boards, etc, etc.
Guess what? We are finally being handed a legal and regulated industry. Scary, yes. Expensive, yes. But we also escape living in a world where what we do is unauthorized...illegal...but we have a "legal defense" of sorts when busted.
Yep- many of us are going to have scale up considerably. But we will have the freedom to do so without fear of Henry 1's flights twice a year. And yep- a lot of players- both small and large...are pretty much done. If you can't produce a product that is good enough for the CA market your days ave very numbered. So be it- these are the people who have created much of the environmental, worker, and criminal abuses in our region.
Maybe you should have explained to people that without a tax in place the county doesn't issue permits. Without county permits you can't get a state permit. Meaning the cannabis industry in SoCo could become completely illegal for 1-2years++. Under a federal administration itching to screw the cannabis industry, and CA in particular.
It was surprising that there was no opposing argument on the ballot, and I assumed it was because there were no objections - that this was county business as usual. Thank you for this article, it makes the whole issue a lot clearer: especially that this tax will make it almost impossible for small growers.
A short video clip can know anything as long as it is long enough to capture what it needs.
Props to Linda Morand for correcting the "King Henry" who wanted to be rid of a meddlesome priest cited in "Resist, Refuse, Sue" (Feb 1). 'Twas, indeed, Henry II, not Henry VIII. BUT, allow me to offer a little correction of Morand's correction. Henry VIII's troubles were with Thomas More (one "o"), the Lord Chancellor of England. The Thomas Moore (two "o"s) that Morand inadvertently identified was an 18th-century Irish poet, singer, songwriter, and entertainer, now best remembered for the lyrics of "The Minstrel Boy" and "The Last Rose of Summer". Just sayin'.
Michael F McCauley
Not much new here, really. Surprising it is considered newsworthy.
I appreciate the Bohemian publishing my OpenMic on the march, as well as a link to Maria de los Angeles' article on the New York march. This talented, young, Mexican artist is a frequent visitor to Santa Rosa. A longer version of my article has been published at over a dozen national sites; it can be read at the following link, which includes photos: http://www.hopedance.org/home/awakenings/3….
The "Resist, Refuse, Sue" article in this week's Boho is must-reading. Rep. Jared Huffman's closing comments are worth considering: "...there is reason to believe there will be the most credible case for impeachment you'll ever see."
Is there any THC in Terpenes?
We can't really be picky with such a long weird name, but we are the Unitarian Universalist Congregation, Santa Rosa. - Rev. Chris.
HellBender needs to be touring nationally
North Bay Bohemian
2017 Metro Newspapers. All rights reserved.
Website powered by Foundation