Pin It
favorite

Citizen Review Boards 

[ | MetroActive Central | ]

How It Works

click to enlarge news2-9722.jpg


Protests: Santa Rosa demonstrators.

Photo by Michael Amsler



By Greg Cahill and Paula Harris

A 1994 UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA report, examining the prevalence of police review boards, found that citizen review of law enforcement increased 74 percent between 1990 and 1994, and has experienced steady growth over the past 25 years.

The report, Citizen Review of the Police: A National Survey by Samuel Walker and Betsy Wright, notes that the growth of citizen review in the United States parallels a similar trend around the world.

Civilian police review boards can have a wide range of powers, from the ability to investigate, adjudicate, and recommend discipline to a simple review of police internal affairs probes. Generally, law enforcement agencies resist any attempt to grant civilian review boards the power to investigate independently, subpoena witnesses, or recommend disciplinary action--principles that the ACLU says are paramount to effective civilian review of the police.

Under state law, a police officer has the right to appeal before any disciplinary action is taken. The city manager has the power to decide on action, but usually defers to the police chief.

There are three basic models for monitoring police actions (each of which can be given significant variations in terms of powers):

Civilian review boards--such as those in Novato, Richmond, and Oakland--are composed of five to 11 appointed members and use the public hearing process. This model tends to make the most economic sense in a small community.

Civilian investigative agencies--like the Office of Citizen Complaints in San Francisco--use professionally trained and paid investigators who interview witnesses and collect evidence.

Auditors--like the San Jose independent police auditor--review the policies, practices, procedures, but don't have the power to investigate. Basically, the auditor simply reviews the police review, but can't do anything about the findings. It's the weakest model.

[ | MetroActive Central | ]

From the May 29-June 4, 1997 issue of the Sonoma County Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1997 Metrosa, Inc.

Pin It
favorite

Tags: ,

Speaking of Issues

Latest in Culture

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Greg Cahill

Find It

Submit an event

Boho Beat

July 21: Chicago Cannon in Santa Rosa

July 23: Ruby Celebration in Healdsburg

July 23: Lifetime of Landscapes in Petaluma

More »

Facebook Activity

Most Commented

  • Of Water and Wine

    New vineyards and resorts rising above the Napa Valley threaten the region's water
    • Jun 15, 2016
  • Put a Bird on It

    New research reveals birds' beneficial impact on Napa Valley vineyards
    • Jul 13, 2016
  • More »

Twitter

Read more @nbaybohemian

Copyright © 2016 Metro Newspapers. All rights reserved.

Website powered by Foundation