The words "Post Sustainability Institute" might be eerily similar to the name of the Santa Rosa-based Post Carbon Institute, but its goals couldn't be more different. While the Post Carbon Institute promotes bike-friendly streets, transit-oriented development and SMART trains as solutions to a growing environmental crisis, members of the Post Sustainability Institute assert that there's a dark side to sustainable development, one that will eventually result in the loss of liberty and the stripping away of private-property rights.
It may sound a little ominous. And yet the nationwide group of activists, loosely called Agenda 21ers, could soon be to sustainable growth what the Tea Party is now to the Obama administration.
Agenda 21ers believe that an 18-year-old United Nations initiative, called Agenda 21, is forcing sustainable development projects in the United States. They say the initiative is corporate-driven and has infiltrated local governments with a smart-growth agenda that will result in the loss of property through eminent domain and increasing land restrictions. Depending on which wing of the group is pointing fingers, Agenda 21 might also be forcing people to ride bikes, stealing family-owned land and boxing the population into congested areas to facilitate government spying.
On Aug. 6, the Post Sustainability Institute sponsors a conference in Santa Rosa, "Behind the Green Mask," featuring talks on smart meters, the "new urbanism" and "recognizing communitarianism."
One of the founders of the Post Sustainability Institute is Rosa Koire. Koire and partner Kay Tokerud are familiar names in local politics; in 2007, Tokerud was asked to step down as president of the Santa Rosa Junior College Neighborhood Association when other members labeled her a "disagreeable character." Speaking of the pair, Neighborhood Alliance chair Judy Kennedy says, "They really rile people." And of Tokerud's presidency, Santa Rosa City Council member Gary Wysocky says, "She didn't run it like a neighbor. She had other ideas."
One of those ideas was a 2007 lawsuit filed by Tokerud against the city to block the formation of a redevelopment district along the Highway 101 corridor. Judgment was awarded to the city, but the Juilliard Park area, where Tokerud owns property, was taken out of the plan, and the Gateways Redevelopment project was put on hold for three years.
"I looked behind it," says Koire, pointing to the International Council on Local Environmental Initiatives as the "implementation" arm of the United Nations, "and I found Agenda 21." (Supervisor Valerie Brown is a board member of ICLEI, but tells the Bohemian she's never heard of a connection between Agenda 21 and property rights.)
Koire, who works as a commercial real estate appraiser specializing in eminent domain valuations for the California Department of Transportation, describes herself a "feminist, pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, anti-war liberal." Her contentious views on eminent domain, "not-smart" trains and bike boulevards in Sonoma County have created a deep divide with otherwise similarly-minded Democrats, who she says "started crawling out of the woodwork and attacking me."
This month, Koire spoke about Agenda 21 to an East Bay Tea Party group. "Property rights are not a right-wing issue," says Koire of the appearance. "I don't know if they think I'm going to hell or what, but they were very nice to me."
In fact, Tea Party groups across the nation have aligned under the anti-Agenda 21 umbrella. In Maine, a Tea Party group issued a "red alert" notice about a development proposal to ease traffic around a major highway. A recent video made by Dean Philpot, a libertarian Texan operating seven blogs including "Peak Oil Freaks," claims that the goal of Transition Towns and the Post-Carbon Institute is "takin' yer land away from ya."
Michael Ruppert, Sebastopol-based journalist profiled in the 2009 documentary Collapse, says the Agenda 21 fear is an example of the scapegoating that occurs when societies face economic collapse. "This is a cookie-cutter tactic practiced by corporations, banks and the powers that be to sow and create political discontent," says Ruppert, "and to separate and divide and distract via needless controversy."
"It's unfortunate that anti-government groups like the Post Sustainability Institute see nefarious plots behind the efforts of those working towards environmental sustainability," says Asher Miller, executive director of the Post Carbon Institute. "After all, we likely share many beliefs—including the value of strong local communities. But I am curious to know what they envision a 'post-sustainable' world looks like. Here's betting they wouldn't actually want to find themselves or their kids there."
Showing 1-3 of 3
Very dismissive but the bulk of evidence stacks up on the side that finds Agenda 21 in virtually every Federal agency, behind many of the Comprehensive Plan Revisions for our local municipalities, and distorts and exaggerates every environmental issue into an approaching disaster IF the citizens don't turn over more authority to unelected bureaucrats, pass local regulations that override existing property rights, and insert costly environmental zealot pipe dreams onto the tax burden of property owners. Here in Norfolk, VA it meant 9 miles of light rail going from downtown Norfolk to virtually nowhere--that ended up costing $33M per mile! The vast majority of elected officials talk "green" without having a clue what they are talking about. When they aren't paying for it, it seems nothing seems too expensive! They drink from the Kool Aid but few of them ever took enough science classes in college to be able to understand how the climate is being destroyed by greenhouse gases without there being any evidence of a greenhouse gas footprint in the upper stratosphere, lower troposhere to be trapping the heat. Or how Willie Soon of Harvard and many others find a 78% corrlelation between solar irradieance and global temperature--but only a 22% correspondence between CO2 levels and global temperatures? Or why Richard Lindzen of MIT finds ample evidence of heat transmission into space using readily available satellite data that the GHG theory says isn't happening? Or why virtually every Climate Alarmist concentrates on data collected between 1978 and 1998 to prove their case--but conveniently ignore temperature records from 1999 to 2010 because these data fail to support their "exponentially worse" theory that the mainstream media picks up on and parrots back to us on a daily basis without ever having to include the facts that supporting evidence has been lacking over the most recent decade. Opps! But they know that the majority of their readers/listeners are undereducated lemmings who have heard the same propaganda now since the early 1970s so most are already programmed to believe it! It's those of us who look at the facts and question the "consensus" who are put up to ridicule! No real scientist recognizes the existance of consensus since the very notion is incompatible with Scientific Method!
George
Suffolk, VA
To Asher Miller -- I would rather live in a "Post Sustainable World" any day than to live with this "Sustainable" Crap. I'll tell you what a Post-sustanable world would look like since you wanted to know. It would look like what we had in the 40s, 50s, 60s , when the U.S. was the one of the strongest industry in the world. We had more jobs , more local production then ANY Other country. Other countries, the "sustainable" types, were so impoverished, and that is why we have so many people flocking here form other countries. they came here for a reason - to get away from that type of restricted living. Now we are subjected to be the same"sustained" or "restricted" with huge job loss due to our industries being shipped overseas by the same Corporations that are pushing this "Smart Growth" to an uninformed society they helped create. The fact that we have an international group making plans and decisions for how the USA is supposed to be run? Doesn't this sound off any alarm bells to you at all? I repeat, an INTERNATIONAL group, that means "foreign" not domestic , interfering with our National Nation State's policies, implementing laws in our Government. Well if you don't know It is unconstitutional on principle alone. Please do some research on history, and see what it took to gain our independence and to whom from. I have nothing against protecting natural resources and finding ways to lessen pollution, but not like this.
I hope that the author of this article gets a chance to read Rosa's terrific book... "Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21" ... she knows a lot and has put herself fully into this liberty-minded advocacy.. I think we might do well to stick together and consider that this is an orchestrated Agenda bigger than Americans could imagine .. not a conspiracy because when haven't the 'powers that be' tried to manage and control the population?