Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: News & Features

Re: “Debriefer May 24, 2017

I just want to share my experience with everyone. I have being hearing about this blank ATM card for a while and i never really paid any interest to it because of my doubts. Until one day i discovered a hacking guy dickson. he is really good at what he is doing. Back to the point, I inquired about The Blank ATM Card. If it works or even Exist. They told me Yes and that its a card programmed for only money withdraws without being noticed and can also be used for free online purchases of any kind. This was shocking and i still had my doubts. Then i gave it a try and asked for the card and agreed to their terms and conditions.. Four days later I received my card and tried with the closest ATM machine close to me, to my greatest surprise It worked like magic. I was able to withdraw up to $2,000 daily. ATM has really change my life. If you want to contact them, Here is the email address: blankatm156@gmail.com

Website: https://blankatm001.wixsite.com/blankatmhacker

Posted by Bruce Springsteen on 03/10/2019 at 1:23 AM

Re: “Hidden Agenda

THE HOAXES BEHIND CONSPIRACY THEORIES LIKE AGENDA 21.
DEBORAH TAVARES & THE FAKE PG&E EMAIL HOAX (THE CALIFORNIA FIRES HOAX)

For all other Deborah Tavares hoax (NASA, Silent Weapons, Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, Genocide), click here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?105568-The-Hoaxes-of-Deborah-Tavares&p=1267477#post1267477

THE HOAX: In the PG&E FAKE Email Hoax, Deborah Tavares claims to have obtained emails which effectively prove that PG&E caused the recent fires in California by beaming energy beams from satellites in space at California. But, her claims about these emails are lies. They are FORGERIES.

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX (Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 11:10-20:00)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fb--FC_oQ (at 1:05-3:40)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7As3d9NgDyk (at 27:20-30:10)

Pacific Gas & Electric ("PG&E") is a California electrical utility company. Over the next few years, PG&E is required by law to generate an increasingly higher and higher percentage of its electrical power without producing any carbon emissions. So, PG&E has increasingly resorted to wind, solar and thermal technology to generate electrical power.

But, PG&E's conventional, ground-based, solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours in good weather. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future, solar panels on satellites in space might be used to generate energy from the Sun 24 hours a day. These satellites might then beam the power to Earth in the form of laser beams or radio frequency beams. The power might then be received at receptor stations on Earth and then converted to electricity for use by its customers.

WHAT PG&E ANNOUNCED IN 2009:
https://www.pge.com/en_US/small-medi...se_link-energy

Solaren is a private California company which has patented the technology described above. In 2009, PG&E entered into a contract with Solaren to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electrical power using this technology. Under the contract, Solaren would own, operate and control all its satellites, rectennas and all the receiver stations. Originally, Solaren promised to provide PG&E with finished electricity by 2016. But, it ran into financial problems and still has not provided any electricity, even at this late date. The California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") approved the contract on the condition that no money from PG&E customers ever be used to develop this technology.

THE CONTRACT:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34239347/n.../#.XHRAB1KFPIU (at paragraphs 1-5)
https://www.afcea.org/content/space-...closer-reality(at paragraphs 8, 9 & 10)
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/(at the final two paragraphs)
https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7(at the final two paragraphs)

Deborah Tavares lives in Sebastopol and has publically opposed PG&E because of its "smart meters". So, when the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and the technology described above for starting those fires. But, there was a problem. The scientific and economic literature indicated that this technology did not yet exist.

CURRENT SCIENTIFIC & ECONOMIC LITERATURE ON THIS TECHNOLOGY:
This technology will not be in use until the end of the decade. See the last 3 paragraphs and the final sentence here. https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7
This technology did not exist in 2017. Beginning at the bottom of page 16 here.
https://space.nss.org/media/NSS-JOUR...olar-Power.pdf
This technology is not in use in 2019. See the last paragraph. https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower.
This technology did not exist in 2018. See the FIRST and LAST paragraph here. http://earthsky.org/earth/space-base...ser-to-reality
This technology will not be in use until at least 2019. See page 62 http://fiso.spiritastro.net/telecon/...e_12-14-16.pdf
This technology did not exist in 2018. See the final paragraph. http://www.alternative-energy-news.i...ls-into-orbit/

SO, TO REBUT ALL THOSE FACTS, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE emails (purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this beam technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to kill us all.

THE FORGERIES:
1. PUBLISHED EMAIL FORGERIES: http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2018/08/2...rn-california/

Afterwards, Deborah Tavares created more FORGED emails reflecting imaginary responses from imaginary experts to which Deborah Tavares allegedly forwarded her FORGED emails above. Not surprisingly, these imaginary experts agreed with Deborah Tavares that this beam technology already existed, that it has long been in use and that it could be used to kill us all.

2. TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES AT ABOUT 20% THROUGH THE TEXT HERE: http://smartmetersmurder.com/

3. THE FINAL TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 17:25-18:40)

Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created the very FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE "PROOF" that PG&E used this future beam technology to start the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.

THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THESE PUBLISHED EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:

1. Tavares did not know what "space weather" actually was (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). "Solar flares" on the surface of the Sun erupt about every 11 years or so. These solar flares extend millions of miles into space and emit extremely high amounts of radiation into space. This radiation is called "space weather" (like a "rain" or "storm" OF RADIATION in space). (It is the Earth's atmosphere which protects all life on Earth from this radiation.). The radiation emitted during such "space weather" is so powerful that it can damage or destroy electrical power transformers here on Earth if they are linked to earth-based solar panels. Such damage can result in power outages. That is why "space weather" would be of concern to PG&E. During "damaging space weather", PG&E has to protect its transformers linked to earth-based solar panels because some such transformers provide electrical power to nuclear power plants and to hospitals which cannot afford power outages for obvious reasons.

DEBORAH TAVARES' MISTAKE:
But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this. She mistakenly believed that "space weather" was WEATHER HERE ON EARTH (like drought and fire) that was artificially created and controlled by lasers, radio frequencies or microwaves beamed at the Earth from satellites IN SPACE (a stupid mistake that a REAL PG&E executive WOULD NOT MAKE).

HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:

In FORGING the phrase "...then have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS, AKA EARTHLINGS, FOR ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENSES RESULTING [FROM DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER]" in the 9:50 email above, Deborah Tavares was referring to the adverse consequences of FIRES WHICH PG&E CAN BLAME ON ITS CUSTOMERS (not realizing that "damaging space weather" is actually radiation in outer space caused by solar flares on the surface of the Sun every 11 years). Unknown to Deborah Tavares, the consequences resulting from "damaging space weather" is actually power outages, NOT FIRES! AND, PG&E CANNOT POSSIBLY BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS FOR ITS OWN POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN EVERY 11 YEARS. So, in creating this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E customers can NEVER be "blamed" for the "consequences" of "damaging space weather", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

2. Likewise, Deborah Tavares did not know the terms of PG&E's contract with Solaren (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). So, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E would never own, operate, manage or control any such satellites, rectennas, receiving stations or have any say in how, when or where energy from satellites in space would be directed. Instead, Solaren would be solely responsible for all of that. Under the contract, all PG&E would ever do would be to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren was ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Under the contract, PG&E is simply a future customer of Solaren. Nothing more. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this.

HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:

So, in FORGING the sentence, "WE [referring to PG&E] have changed OUR receptor site from the Mojave desert (sic) to Sebastopol" in the 10:03 email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion that she was so important to PG&E that it actually "targeted" her with radio frequency waves beamed from satellites in space in retaliation for her opposition to PG&E "smart meters". See PROOF here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 18:40-19:20). Are you kidding me?! What a narcissist!

Regardless, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E had no ability to aim Solaren's energy beams or to move Solaren's receptor station from one place to another (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

Further, Deborah Tavares did not know that Solaren's actual receptor site is in Fresno, hundreds of miles away from the Mojave Desert (something a REAL PG&E executive would know).

PROOF THAT FRESNO (NOT SEBASTOPOL) IS THE REAL RECEPTOR SITE:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34239347/n.../#.XHRAB1KFPIU (at the 3rd paragraph)
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/ (at end of 2nd paragraph)
https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower (at the 16th paragraph)

Moreover, Deborah Tavares did not know that such receiver rectennas are up to six miles in diameter (which would make it obvious to every person living in Sebastopol if it had actually had been relocated there as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims).

Finally, a REAL PG&E executive would not refer to Solaren's receptor site as "OUR" receptor site, would know that Solaren's receptor station was in Fresno (not in the Mojave Desert) and would know that PG&E had no power or ability to change Solaren's receptor site. The foregoing mistakes prove that this email is a forgery.

3. Use your own common sense. As to the 10:03 email, how likely is it that a PG&E executive would open an email to the CPUC with a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of exactly how Solaren's technology worked? The CPUC had just approved of PG&E's use of Solaren's technology provided that PG&E never invested any of its customer's money to finance the project. The CPUC did not need a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of Solaren's technology in which PG&E played no part and could claim no credit. This "reminder" serves NO PURPOSE.

4. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would refer to PG&E's customers as "EARTHLINGS" in connection with an email about a "COVER UP" of "damaging space weather" which can cause nothing but power outages?

5. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would tell PG&E to have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS "AKA EARTHLINGS" FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF "DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES WHICH CANNOT POSSIBLY BE BLAMED ON PG&E CUSTOMERS. This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THE UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:

1. The sentence, "You as a California resident have every right to know what your "public utilities" are doing with their (sic) "RATE DOLLARS", was not written by an expert, as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims. Unknown to Deborah Tavares, no "rate dollars" from any PG&E customer has or will ever be used to finance the research and development of Solaren's technology (which will be financed, owned and operated solely by Solaren). Under the contract, PG&E would merely be a future customer of Solaren and buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Again, no PG&E customer money will ever be used to develop Solaren's technology. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this when writing this FORGERY. That mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

2. The term, "EARTH, INC." in "comment ONE:" a "signature" term ACTUALLY CREATED, COINED and REPEATEDLY USED BY Deborah Tavares. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...iz.42h9ExblMs8

3. The phrase, "very disturbing" in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares phrase. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.ld2pLLtGq-c

4. The term, "FOIA", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.MsKCoGqM1QE

5. The term, "iceberg", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.brv_lDgjd1o

6. The term, "footprints", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.6jJyS4QOIyw

7. The term, "assessment", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...iz.VQSLXAWgla8

8. BOTH "comment ONE:" and "comment TWO:" contain hyphenated terms (" - "), a writing custom rare in today's world, suggesting that BOTH comment ONE and comment TWO were written by the same person, which of course, they were.

PG&E may actually be using laser or radio frequencies beamed from satellites in space to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THESE PARTICULAR FORGED EMAILS THEMSELVES (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provide no support for that proposition, because they are FORGERIES!

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.

Posted by snoop4truth on 03/08/2019 at 10:59 AM

Re: “Cleanup Crew

From the SF Examiner:
"[....]The lawsuit, filed in federal court in San Francisco, alleges that Tetra Tech Inc. and Ashbritt Inc., a subcontractor working under the supervision of Tetra, instructed or knowingly permitted subcontractors to excavate more than a permitted six inches of soil, remove structures unaffected by the fires and destroy property. It alleges they told government agencies and property owners that land that remained contaminated had been cleaned in a bid to increase profits."

http://www.sfexaminer.com/firm-center-hunters-point-shipyard-scandal-sued-north-bay-fire-cleanup-work/?utm_source=The+Examiner+E-dition&utm_campaign=825c559f62-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_01_22_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e2b97b1e7f-825c559f62-261009113

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by kitlofroos on 02/28/2019 at 10:38 PM

Re: “The Big Interrupt

Your perception of the world, people and society could not be more wrong. You have powered your way through life with deep fears and insecurities. People completely tune you out and tolerate you but will not venture to be truthful with you because its too much of a hassle, and you simply wont listen. You know it all. My guess is that you have had a very, very painful upbringing. God help you. Sincerely.

Posted by badabing on 02/12/2019 at 7:23 PM

Re: “Sole Man

A warm hearted story that gives a glimpse of the pain, struggle and strength of spirit in one man's life.

Posted by James Carouba on 01/31/2019 at 9:40 AM

Re: “American Hazmat

In addition, it's tiresome to listen to the politicians avoid the problem--the public. It's a sad statement that people can't do the right thing when no one is watching. Sadly the public seem to need to be baby-sat, can't pick up after themselves or leave things the way they found it. Wake up folks! No government should have to take care of things on this level. Pathetic.

Posted by John Dietz on 01/31/2019 at 8:35 AM

Re: “American Hazmat

Does it not occur to anyone that the people/public are the problem causing the trash. Have Californians not hear or understand the phrase "leave no trace". In a shutdown, why would the public decide to show their true nature, ignorant.

Posted by John Dietz on 01/31/2019 at 6:40 AM

Re: “Debriefer May 24, 2017

I am Mr Eliot Snel I live in USA, I want to use this medium to thank Mr Van Alfons who helped me with one of his white cards. Before I was as poor without funds until I saw his email on the net. And today am also testifying on how he helped me I never believe it until I also applied for one blank card. They sent me the card which am using today if you want to apply for the blank ATM card contact (vanalfons22@outlook.com) Thank you.

Posted by Bahadur Subir James on 01/29/2019 at 3:21 PM

Re: “Sole Man

A well written article. This story was very informative and inspiring. Shows that dreams, they can come true.

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Precila on 01/23/2019 at 9:46 AM

Re: “Debriefer: April 26, 2017

I am Harry Grace, from New York, USA I cant stop thanking DR boadi for this Great thing that he has done in my life, I am so grateful to him, i was suffering from HIV virus for 11years,when i contacted DR boadi after reading the wonderful testimony that people has been sharing about him. I have being on medication and trying looking for cure to my ailment. I went through internet doctors and i contacted a Trade medical/Traditional doctor named, Dr boadi for help. He give me all his rules and regulations,that if he cured me that I should write about him on internet site and that is what Im doing now. He assure me that he will cure me with his herbal medicine which he really did, and Im now completely cured from HIV virus. What will i say rather than thanking him for saving me. Why suffering in silence when there is remedy to your diseases Dr Boadi also specialize in curing the following disease:
*HIV/Aids
*Kidney failure
*Arthritis
*Diabetes
*Hypertension
*Stroke
*Obesity
*Infertility/Impotency
*Cancer
*Eye Problem
*Skin Problem
*Fibroid Tumo\r
*Ulcer
*Prostate Problem
*Asthma
*Weight Management
*Gonorrhea/Staphylococcus
*Candide
*Low sperm can
*Weak erection
*Weak ejaculation
*Pile
*Elephantiasis
*Skin Infection
*Paralysis e.t.c
*If you want your ex back.
*If you always have bad dreams.
*Herpes
*Hpv
*If you want to be promoted in your office. For more information contact Dr boadi via email:(drgodstimeboadi@gmail .com), you can also call him on his mobile number or WhatsApp +2348144964531

Posted by Donald Harry on 12/30/2018 at 2:39 PM

Re: “The Independent

Good overview of the Bohemian's genealogy; I had looked you up on Wikipedia a while back but got lost in all the convolutions. Seeing you from Boland's PoV really helps.
An example of how mainstream newspapers are transitioning - & so far surviving - is also the Guardian (UK).
Here's to you and another year of excellent local investigative reporting!

Posted by leslie 2 on 12/25/2018 at 9:19 PM

Re: “The Rent Kept a-Rollin'

This innocuous and informational article was rolling around fine until about 3/4 of the way through, when the author felt it necessary to promote racism. Why is it ok to degenerate an entire class of people if they are "white". Racism is racism, and this is a clear case. Oh, do you want to say it's true so it's not....welll that is a very slippery slope indeed. Either stop classifying people by their race or let every racial slur stand. But, inserting it into an article, and propagating the disrespect of the Press Democrat is BS!

Posted by Witzundlachen on 12/14/2018 at 11:36 AM

Re: “Grow-Site Pain

I was appalled at this ridiculously biased attack piece on supervisor Lynda Hopkins...then I realized, this isn't SUPPOSED to be "journalism" it was an advertisement!

5 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by sedna101 151 on 12/12/2018 at 10:30 AM

Re: “Grow-Site Pain

Friends of Graton was not happy to be ignored for this article, but in Tom's defense he did offer us the OpenMic in the next issue of the Bohemian which comes out Wednesday, a day after the Supervisors hearing. Since we are not sure of the status of the project until we hear if there will possibly be a revision or a new project, we have decided to wait to make comment until that time. You are correct, Dian, that what you have described is the current proposed project.

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by AnnaR on 12/10/2018 at 4:01 PM

Re: “Grow-Site Pain

At no point in this article did Goggola cite the main reasons for residents' opposition to the project:

"This mammoth project calls for 18 greenhouses, 30 parking spaces, 8' high perimeter fencing, 12 water tanks, 2 buildings (5050 sq. ft.), a security station, camera surveillance, outdoor grow, nighttime lighting - all accessed by narrow Railroad Street." (Joe Howard, Graton)

Very disappointed in this failure to observe high journalistic ethics, Tom. The attempt to frame the article as an impeachment of the neutrality of Hopkins' role indicates you understand the valid reasons for opposition and concern yet have paid them no attention, instead opting for an attack on the 5th district supervisor and thus supporting cries of NIMBYism when this is absolutely not true. That's the story - go follow it, please!

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Dian Hardy on 12/10/2018 at 3:14 PM

Re: “Grow-Site Pain

Joe, I'm not sure why you feel that way, but I think if you met Jack you wouldn't see any of the arrogance that you imply. Meet him, talk with him, take his measure. Then decide.

Posted by Richard Buck on 12/09/2018 at 4:58 PM

Re: “Grow-Site Pain

Well, it certainly was a terribly researched and intentionally divisive article, and despite your efforts at getting more reasonable as the comment string went on, Mr Buck, it feels to me that your approach is far from 'win-win,' but more like 'I always expect to win, you all just don't understand how right I am.'

Enough has been written about many negative and controversial aspects of this project, but the one thing I haven't seen that should be a deal-killer is the nature of Railroad Street. It's a one lane road. How in the world will it handle the traffic, and especially the truck traffic, that this project will require. This use is simply inappropriate for this location in every way.

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Joe Rogoff on 12/09/2018 at 3:50 PM

Re: “Grow-Site Pain

MHilber,

Apologies if that sounded condescending, I didn't mean to come across that way, but curious as to why you think it should not be on the Consent Calendar?

Also, I do find it odd that you say "I do not subscribe...Press Democrat", but on 07/26/2018 you have a comment in the Bohemian that says "Good news..." and then you provide a link and quotes from an article in PD. You do read it, but I guess you don't subscribe.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by MHobbes on 12/09/2018 at 12:56 PM

Re: “Grow-Site Pain

MHobbes

That is very condescending the way you replied to me. No I did not see the ad you reference and I do not subscribe to that crap the press Democrat. And yes i am more than well aware of what the "Consent Calendar" is and its "purpose." Supervisor Gore allows a person only 2 minutes total to comment on any and all consent items, so if one wanted to comment on only 4 of these 52 items you could budget 30 seconds each for your comments. No I do not believe this belongs on the consent calendar as a routine business matter. And I question how the "ad-hoc" decided this belonged there, expecting it to pass as a routine matter.
Plenty of their activities raise Brown Act concerns.

0 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by MHilber on 12/09/2018 at 12:42 PM

Re: “Grow-Site Pain

MHilber,

I'm imagine you saw the ad in Press Democrat by Waybrook Associates (Cheryl Buck is Agent for Service of Process) talking about the consent calendar item. Consent Calendars are the way local governments work, there are not long lengthy discussions about every item. There are 52 consent items on Dec 11th agenda and they will be voted as a block. We elect them to represent us and it is up to us to read the minutes from previous meetings and upcoming agenda information packages, and contact the Board of Supervisors. A lot of people contact their elected officials to express their views. The BOS takes the input from the citizens to help inform their decision. But it is up to us to stay informed and contact our representatives. The government is not there to spoon feed us, we must actively participate.

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by MHobbes on 12/09/2018 at 12:16 PM

Facebook Activity

This Week's Issue

March 20-26, 2019
Issue Cover

Copyright © 2019 Metro Newspapers. All rights reserved.

Website powered by Foundation