Karin Lease 
Member since Jun 4, 2012

Recent Comments

Re: “Grow-Site Pain

The point of the article to me is that we expect unbiased, fair and just representation from our "democratically elected officials" and it appears that's not what we're getting. We deserve for our representative to try to fully inform us and create a space for stakeholders in conflict to come together and communicate in a meaningful way. It appears to me that our supervisor has taken a strong position against the applicants, their application and against cannabis in general. But it's not too late. Collaboration is possible. Let's make space for that.... Face to face. I think we can work through a lot of our differences, but not if we just take fixed positions and close ourselves to respectful communication and compromise. This is an opportunity to do that, not to war and treat each other as enemies. We can do this. I have faith. This is the path wth the most benefit i think.

5 likes, 14 dislikes
Posted by Karin Lease on 12/06/2018 at 10:52 PM

Re: “The Carrillo Quandary

He has been asked about Preservation ranch. He will vote for development in all cases. He doesn't seem to care about the future of Sonoma County and the folks who will be here in the future.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Karin Lease on 06/04/2012 at 10:02 PM

Re: “The Carrillo Quandary

I’d like to remind voters that an election is NOT a popularity contest or a game to be won. Someone may be young, socially adept, charming and truly kind but that does not automatically make him the best candidate for the position. You have to look beneath the surface for the truth.

I like to look at actual actions taken by the candidate for the common good and then make my choice.

I find Efren Carillo’s environmental voting record to be disturbing. He has not kept his word to MANY of us as far as so many things he said he was going to do.

For instance, he said something like…”No more gravel mining in the Russian River period,” then he voted to increase Syar’s gravel mining contract from 5 to 15 years! He told many of us personally that he would not vote for the Dutra asphalt plant on the Petaluma River. We all know the outcome of that one!

As far as town hall meetings/community visioning etc, what good are they if the person with the vote negates the agreed upon project when it comes time to vote? I’m referring to the Sebastopol Rd project that the community worked so hard on. Mr Carillo also promised to work on changing the laws regarding the impound of the vehicles of unlicensed drivers when speaking at a rally of the local UFW. Did he follow through? No.

He voted for a 45’ tall winery and vineyards to be built along the scenic corridor of Hwy 116 in a residential neighborhood, against the ardent pleas and protests of the community and neighbors.

We have lost more land to vineyards, including along the coast. General plan amendments are granted regularly to accommodate developers.

If you care about the children (and their future), then wouldn’t you work a lot harder to preserve the natural resources of Sonoma County? Our children and grandchildren need clean air and water, scenic vistas and wholesome places to recreate, not more vineyards, traffic, greenhouse gases, pollution and industrial plants. I fear that our county is going to be another Contra Costa County very soon unless this dangerous trend is STOPPED.

If you care about the elders, then PLEASE respect all the work they have done on the General Plan to guide us through this difficult growth process. Many elders with foresight and a vision for the future worked very hard to create a blueprint for development so that Sonoma County would remain the wonderful place to live that it once was! So respect your elders by not granting amendments to accommodate development. If an amendment is necessary, then the project is probably not appropriate. The current business model, based on endless growth is to the informed person, highly unsustainable! We need to develop new, perhaps creative ways to maintain a viable economy other than “development” and new construction/destruction. Otherwise, what will remain?

I am very alarmed, to say the least, at the trend of the decisions of this current board of supervisors. This can only have tragic results.

So I say….Respect Your Elders. Love the Children. Care for the Earth. Not just with words, but with your actions.

This is why I’m NOT voting for Efren Carillo, even though I like him.

I’m voting for Ernie Carpenter, because I know he is not running for his own personal ambitions, but to be of service to the citizens of Sonoma County.

Thank you,
Karin Lease

4 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Karin Lease on 06/04/2012 at 10:00 PM

Re: “Marching for Reform

Yes and they didn't invite Efren Carillo back because he didn't keep his word on changing/adjustin the vehicle impound laws as he promised thousands of attendees the previous year.

Posted by Karin Lease on 06/04/2012 at 9:37 PM

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Out There

    Art takes flight at new Sebastopol craft boutique Kitty Hawk
    • Dec 2, 2015
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Copyright © 2019 Metro Newspapers. All rights reserved.

Website powered by Foundation